In Section 8.6 we learned that loading, shear and bending moments are related by integral and differential equations, and used this knowledge to draw shear and bending moment diagram suing a graphical approach. This method is easy and fast in cases when you can easily calculate the areas under the loading and shear curves without integration. Beams consisting of point and uniformly distributed loads only do not require the use of the calculus method.
However, there are times that the graphical technique falls short when the areas are more complicated than rectangles or triangles. For example, a uniformly varying load, which is a first degree linear function of \(x\text{,}\) integrates to a second degree parabolic shear function, and a third degree cubic moment function. To use the graphical method you would need to find the area under the parabolic shear curve to compute the cubic moment. When the loading becomes more complex it is better to use perform the integration directly.
but instead of finding areas and slopes using geometry, we will integrate the load function \(w(x)\) to find the \(\Delta V\text{,}\) then integrate that result to find the \(\Delta M\text{.}\)
These results are the change in shear and moment over a segment; to find the actual shear and moment functions \(V(x)\) and \(M(x)\) for the entire beam we will need to find initial values for each segment. This is equivalent to using boundary conditions to find the constant of integration when solving a differential equation. The initial values come from either the final value of the previous segment or from point loads or point moments. Because of the requirement for these segment starting values, no segment can be computed in isolation from the other segments. Physically this means that the shear and moment along a beam are not just due to the loading in one segment, but are related to the loading on the rest of the beam as well.
Before you can find shear and bending moment functions with integration you must know the equation for the load on each segment of the beam. These equations may be given in the problem statement if you’re lucky, or you may have to determine them from a loading diagram.
When determining equations for loading segments, you may choose either global equations, where all segments use the same origin, usually at the left end of the beam, or local equations, where each segment uses its own origin, usually at the left end of the segment. Often local equations are easier because you can simply use the variable \(x\) in your equations as opposed to “\(x\) + constant”, and you do not have to project the \(y\)-intercept values back to an axis system which is not adjacent to the segment. See interactive Figure 8.8.1 to explore the difference between local and global equations.
A uniformly distributed load is constant over the segment and results in a linear slope, either a triangle or a trapezoid, on the shear diagram. The loading function on such sections is
In this case the loading function is a straight, sloping lie forming a triangle or trapezoidal shape. The resulting shear function is parabolic. The general form of these functions are
\begin{equation*}
w(x) = m x + b \qquad V(x) = \frac{mx^2}{2} + bx + c\text{.}
\end{equation*}
The slope \(m\text{,}\) intercept \(b\text{,}\) and constant \(c\) must be determined from the situation, and will depend on whether you are writing a global or local equation.
Most gravitational distributed loads are drawn with the arrows pointing down and resting on the beam. If you slide these along their line of action so that their tails are on the beam, the tips define the loading equation.
Notice as you change the slope, global intercept, and location of point \(A\) that the only values that shift between local and global equations are the \(y\) intercept values (\(b'\) vs. \(b'\)) and the \(x\) coordinate of \(A\text{.}\)
You can either use this method from the start or use the graphical method until you need areas of shapes more complicated than rectangles and triangles.
Integrate the loading equation \(w(x)\) to find the change in the shear \(\Delta V\) and include the shear value at the beginning of your loading segment including the influence of any point loads at that location, which is equivalent to the integration constant.
Integrate the shear equation \(V(x)\) to find the change in the bending moment \(\Delta M\) and include the moment value at the beginning of your loading segment including the influence of any point couple-moments at that location, equivalent to the integration constant.
To find maximum shear and bending moments, recall from calculus that the local maximum/minimum points of a function occur at the endpoints and where the function’s first derivative is equal to zero.
For shear, evaluate the shear function \(V(x)\) at the ends and where ever the load function crosses the \(x\) axis.
For bending moments, find the roots of the shear function by solving \(V(x)=0\text{,}\) then evaluate the moment function \(M(x)\) at these points, and also at the endpoints.
The critical values we are looking for are the points where the magnitudes of the shear and bending moment are maximum. The direction of the internal forces is not usually significant.
Use the integration method to find the equations for shear and moment as a function of \(x\text{,}\) for a simply supported beam carrying a uniformly distributed load \(w\) over its entire length \(L\text{.}\)
There is a pinned connection at \(x=0\) which provides a vertical force and no concentrated moment, so the initial conditions there are \(V(0) = wL/2\text{,}\) and \(M(0) = 0\text{.}\)
